The goal of our research was to elaborate a profile of exhaust systems market in Poland according to the scheme shown in the table of contents listed below.
We can estimate that the size of mufflers market is on the level of about 2,2 million pcs yearly, so it is one of most important fragments of auto parts market.
In the elaboration, there is plenty of “cross-opinions” of workshops’ which have different criterions of choice and prefer various competitive trade-marks of products.

To learn more about report click MORE.
Report is prepared as an Word file, it include 32 tables and attached as PowerPoint presentation are 30 graphs perfectly expressing many aspects of this market. Of course enclosed are comments indicating most important elements.
You can order it in an english version. The price of a single License for „EXHAUST SYSTEMS MARKET IN POLAND” report is 800 EUR. If you are interested in purchasing of this report, please e-mail us on alfred@motofocus.pl If you need some additional information, please call: Alfred Franke +48 22 489-72-21 do 23

CONTENTS

2. DESCRIPTION OF COMPANIES INCLUDED
The sample’s structure, regional disposition (tab.0, 1, graph.1)

3. BEHAVIOR ANALYSES (CRITERIONS FOR TRADE-MARKS CHOICE)
(tab.2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, graph.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7)

3.1 Purchasing criteria – one and three indications
3.2 Purchasing criteria – Asmet, Bosal, Walker – one indication

3.3 Purchasing criteria – all workshops, Asmet, Bosal, – three indications
3.4 Purchasing criteria – all workshops, Polish brands
3.5 Purchasing criteria – all workshops, Leaders (best workshops)
3.6 Purchasing criteria – workshops vs. customers criteria – one and three indications
3.7 Proportion: muffler replacement vs. repair – all workshops

3.8 Proportion: replacement vs. repair – Asmet, Bosal, Walker, Polish brands
3.8 Proportion: replacement vs. repair – all workshops, Leaders (best workshops)

4. DISTRIBUTIVE CANALS
(tab.8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, graph.8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18)

4.1 Prefered brand’s share – all together

4.2 Prefered brand’s share – Asmet, Bosal, Walker
4.3 Prefered brand’s share – Polish brands, western brands (incl. Tesh)
4.4 Number of customers – all workshops
4.5 Number of customers – workshops prefering Asmet, Bosal, Walker
4.6 Speed of delivery (efficiency of distribution) – all together

4.7 Speed of delivery (efficiency of distribution) – Asmet, Bosal, Walker
4.8 Speed of delivery (efficiency of distribution) – all together, Polmostrów

5. EXHAUST SYSTEMS DAMAGES, CUSTOMERS RETURNS
(tab.19, 20, 24 graph.19, 20, 24)
(tab.21, 22, 23, graph.21, 22, 23,) – available only for companies commissioning research

5.1 Causes of damages – one and three indications
5.2 Time period between repairs (all brands together)
5.3 Time period between repairs; Asmet, Bosal, Walker, Polmostrów, Tesh (data available only for companies commissioning research)

6. FITTING ELEMENTS
(tab.25, 26, 27, 28, graph.25, 26, 27, 28)

6.1 Best fitting elements – one and three indications

6.2 Fitting elements replacement criteria – all together
6.3 Fitting elements replacement criteria – Asmet, Bosal, Walker customers
6.3 Fitting elements replacement criteria – all together, Leaders (best workshops)

7. DURABILITY OF MUFFLERS
(tab.29, 30, graph.29, 30)

7.1 Percentage distribution – influence of fitting elements replacement on durability of mufflers

8. TRAININGS
(tab.31, tab32)

8.1 Expectations toward trainings – one and three indications
8.2 Expectations toward trainings – Asmet, Bosal, Polmostrów and Walker customers